← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ethan Straky Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-04-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 43 4 15 19 0.442 0.3426 0.3426 1.6447 1.6447
2020-21 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 50 2 14 16 0.320 0.2481 0.2481 1.1910 1.1910
2021-22 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 22 2 3 5 0.227 0.1397 0.1397 0.6697 0.6698
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Ohio State D1 BigTen SR 33 1 6 7 0.212
2024-25 Colorado College D1 NCHC JR 32 0 6 6 0.188
2023-24 Colorado College D1 NCHC SO 37 2 3 5 0.135
2022-23 Colorado College D1 NCHC FR 38 2 8 10 0.263
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.26
2022-23 · Colorado College
+99.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
38%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8742
Defenseman overall
#1997
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Brown (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.10 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Bentley (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Saint John's · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2006-07
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint John's · 2020-21
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.