Dominic Pajkic Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-01-15 Country: USA

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2024-25	Sherwood Park Crusaders	BCHL	0	0	0	0	0.000	—	—	—	—
2025-26	Minot Minotauros	NAHL	41	4	11	15	0.366	0.1344	0.1451	0.3867	0.4175
2026-27	Northeast Generals	NAHL	8	0	13	13	1.625	0.5970	0.6250	1.7175	1.7981

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%

NCAA D1

NCAA D2/D3

85%

Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11276

Defenseman overall

#727

Defenseman born in 2008

Western Michigan Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Ronnie Attard

USHL 2018-19

0.47

actual FR PPG at Western Michigan

D2/3 Comparables

Paul Rodrigues

SUNY Oswego · 2007-08

0.893 Strong

actual D2/3 PPG

Craig Kennedy

Hamilton · 2000-01

1.353 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Roman Cherniak

Lawrence · 2023-24

0.842 Strong

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.