IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dominic Pajkic Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-01-15 Country: USA
Western Michigan
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Sherwood Park Crusaders BCHL 0 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2025-26 Minot Minotauros NAHL 41 4 11 15 0.366 0.1344 0.1451 0.3862 0.4170
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11075
Defenseman overall
#636
Defenseman born in 2008

D1 Comparables

Garrett Cecere
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Clint Lewis
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Cornell (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Alec McCrea
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Cornell (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Alex Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Jack Stander
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Canisius (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Western Michigan Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Carson Vance
NAHL 2013-14
0.04
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan
Luke Witkowski
SHL 2025-26
0.19
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan
Grady Gallatin
USHS-MN 2021-22
0.00
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan
Cameron Lee
USHL 2014-15
0.37
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan

D2/3 Comparables

Evan Mitchell
Chatham · 2018-19
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mitchell Herlihey
SUNY Oswego · 2011-12
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Blake Barkwell
Adrian · 2004-05
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.