← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Greene Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-10-21 Country: Canada
2022 NHL Draft Round 2, Pick #57  ·  Chicago Blackhawks Chicago Blackhawks
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 USHL 18 3 2 5 0.278 0.1708 0.1708 0.8185 0.8185
2020-21 USHL 51 12 20 32 0.627 0.3857 0.3857 1.8487 1.8487
2021-22 USHL 59 19 32 51 0.864 0.5313 0.5449 2.5467 2.6121
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Boston University D1 HockeyEast JR 40 13 25 38 0.950
2023-24 Boston University D1 HockeyEast SO 40 12 24 36 0.900
2022-23 Boston University D1 HockeyEast FR 38 9 22 31 0.816
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.51
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.82
2022-23 · Boston University
+60.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

92%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8689
Forward overall
#361
Forward born in 2003
#759
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.81 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Michigan (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.49 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.98 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.90 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Elmira · 2017-18
1.067 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2023-24
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Salem State · 2021-22
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.