← New Search ↗ Social Card

Owen Fowler Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-06-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Governors Academy NE-Prep 28 10 9 19 0.679 0.1914 0.1914 0.3105 0.3105
2019-20 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 2 1 0 1 0.500 0.3074 0.3074 1.4731 1.4731
2020-21 USHL 53 12 9 21 0.396 0.2435 0.2435 1.1673 1.1673
2021-22 USHL 55 10 27 37 0.673 0.4135 0.3956 1.9819 1.8961
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Maine D1 HockeyEast SR 34 12 10 22 0.647
2024-25 Maine D1 HockeyEast 38 10 10 20 0.526
2023-24 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast 0 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast 33 5 7 12 0.364
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2022-23 · UMass Lowell
+35.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

88%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14847
Forward overall
#754
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.74 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Vermont (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.72 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wilkes · 2015-16
1.423 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2013-14
1.536 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Stevenson · 2018-19
1.148 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.