← New Search ↗ Social Card

Owen Fowler Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-06-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Governors Academy NE-Prep 28 10 9 19 0.679 0.1344 0.1344 0.3092 0.3092
2019-20 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 2 1 0 1 0.500 0.2949 0.2949 1.5017 1.5017
2020-21 USHL 53 12 9 21 0.396 0.2337 0.2337 1.1899 1.1899
2021-22 USHL 55 10 27 37 0.673 0.3968 0.3796 2.0204 1.9329
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Maine D1 HockeyEast SR 34 12 10 22 0.647
2024-25 Maine D1 HockeyEast 38 10 10 20 0.526
2023-24 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast 0 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast 33 5 7 12 0.364
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2022-23 · UMass Lowell
+50.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

90%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15236
Forward overall
#779
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Bemidji State
0.36 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.97 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chatham · 2021-22
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Canton · 2022-23
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2000-01
1.115 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.