← New Search ↗ Social Card

Victor Czerneckianair Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-02-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Tri-City Storm USHL 3 0 1 1 0.333 0.2049 0.2049 0.9820 0.9820
2020-21 Tri-City Storm USHL 23 5 3 8 0.348 0.2138 0.2138 1.0247 1.0247
2021-22 Tri-City Storm USHL 34 7 14 21 0.618 0.3796 0.3576 1.8196 1.7142
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC SR 40 6 13 19 0.475
2024-25 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC JR 38 7 9 16 0.421
2023-24 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC SO 39 7 7 14 0.359
2022-23 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC FR 40 3 5 8 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.31
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2022-23 · Quinnipiac
-34.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

78%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14654
Forward overall
#741
Forward born in 2002
#1463
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Maine (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Princeton (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Elmira · 2015-16
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Lebanon Valley · 2014-15
1.280 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2010-11
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.