IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sean Patterson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1983-04-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Surrey Eagles BCHL 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2001-02 Surrey Eagles BCHL 57 2 11 13 0.228 0.0879 0.0884 0.3324 0.3344
2002-03 Surrey Eagles BCHL 55 3 13 16 0.291 0.1121 0.1079 0.4239 0.4081
2003-04 Surrey Eagles BCHL 53 2 14 16 0.302 0.1163 0.1068 0.4399 0.4040
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 Amherst D3 — SR 6 1 0 1 0.167
2008-09 Amherst D3 — JR 3 0 0 0 0.000
2007-08 Amherst D3 — SO 1 0 0 0 0.000
2004-05 Wentworth D3 — FR 2 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#16237
Defenseman overall
#1217
Defenseman born in 1983
#2591
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kyle Kussmann
SUNY Brockport · 2024-25
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mitch Kontny
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2012-13
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Derek Britner
UMass Dartmouth · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.