IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Les Reaney Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1984-07-08 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2001-02 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 56 27 33 60 1.071 0.4128 0.4411 1.5592 1.6659
2002-03 — BCHL 60 26 41 67 1.117 0.4303 0.4412 1.6251 1.6661
2003-04 — BCHL 59 26 38 64 1.085 0.4179 0.4098 1.5786 1.5482
2004-05 Williams Lake TimberWolves BCHL 60 38 62 100 1.667 0.6422 0.5999 2.4255 2.2656
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2007-08 Niagara D1 AHA JR 25 5 10 15 0.600
2006-07 Niagara D1 AHA SO 37 16 28 44 1.189
2005-06 Niagara D1 AHA FR 35 13 27 40 1.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.49
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.14
2005-06 · Niagara
+134.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#5667
Forward overall
#179
Forward born in 1984
#48
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Mike Szmatula
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.21 PPG
→ Northeastern (1.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Michael Huntebrinker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Wahlin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tim Bonner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.48 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eric Scheid
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lucas Signoretti
Buffalo State · 2024-25
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Woodward
SUNY Oswego · 2002-03
1.226 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jared Goudreau
Southern New Hampshire · 2014-15
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.