IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dominick Rivelli Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-08-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2020-21 Oklahoma Warriors NAHL 48 4 2 6 0.125 0.0495 0.0495 0.1312 0.1312
2021-22 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 8 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2022-23 Langley Rivermen BCHL 30 5 13 18 0.600 0.2235 0.2201 — —
2023-24 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 54 31 17 48 0.889 0.3522 0.3376 0.9333 0.8945
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast SO 19 1 1 2 0.105
2024-25 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast — 4 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14488
Forward overall
#705
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andrew Romano
SUNY Geneseo · 2015-16
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Storjohann
SUNY Cortland · 2016-17
0.565 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
James Willis
Manhattanville · 2000-01
0.700 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.