IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brandon Wong Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-11-30 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
KRS-BSU Beijing · VHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Surrey Eagles BCHL 60 8 20 28 0.467 0.1738 0.1913 0.6800 0.7483
2004-05 — BCHL 59 32 38 70 1.186 0.4419 0.4657 1.7287 1.8218
2005-06 Merritt Centennials BCHL 60 50 66 116 1.933 0.7202 0.7229 2.8170 2.8276
2019-20 KRS-BSU Beijing VHL 7 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 Quinnipiac D1 — SR 40 19 22 41 1.025
2008-09 Quinnipiac D1 — JR 28 9 12 21 0.750
2007-08 Quinnipiac D1 — SO 39 13 24 37 0.949
2006-07 Quinnipiac D1 — FR 40 27 17 44 1.100
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.58
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.10
2006-07 · Quinnipiac
+90.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#5314
Forward overall
#186
Forward born in 1986

D1 Comparables

Zach Stepan
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.39 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.84 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Peter Quenneville
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.11 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.80 D1 FR PPG)
0.68 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Toninato
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.09 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.67 Average
NCAAe PPG
Frank Vatrano
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ UMass
0.61 No data
NCAAe PPG
Dennis Kravchenko
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.11 PPG
→ UMass (0.92 D1 FR PPG)
0.68 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Geordan Buffoline
New England · 2017-18
1.667 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Joona Juntunen
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2023-24
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Conor Landrigan
Utica · 2016-17
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.