IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Travis Shoudy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-03-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Austin Bruins NAHL 37 1 2 3 0.081 0.0321 0.0321 — —
2020-21 Austin Bruins NAHL 55 5 23 28 0.509 0.2017 0.2017 0.5345 0.5345
2021-22 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 62 8 25 33 0.532 0.3272 0.3094 1.5683 1.4830
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Michigan D1 BigTen — 17 0 3 3 0.176
2025-26 Michigan State D1 BigTen SR 17 0 3 3 0.176
2024-25 Ferris State D1 CCHA SR 36 6 12 18 0.500
2023-24 Ferris State D1 CCHA JR 36 4 16 20 0.556
2022-23 Ferris State D1 CCHA SO 32 4 7 11 0.344
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.34
2022-23 · Ferris State
+17.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

72%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5568
Defenseman overall
#1409
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Connor Murphy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Cornell (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Victor Newell
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Harvard (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Taylor Fleming
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Barrett Kaib
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Providence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Jared Kolquist
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tanner Congdon
Bryn Athyn · 2016-17
0.857 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lucas Michaud
Trinity · 2016-17
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Bradley Somers
Adrian · 2021-22
0.871 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.