IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jordan Chong Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-08-21 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Alberni Valley Bulldogs BCHL 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2004-05 Portage Terriers MJHL 21 7 2 9 0.429 0.0825 0.0819 0.2701 0.2682
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 St. Scholastica D3 — SR 28 17 20 37 1.321
2008-09 St. Scholastica D3 — JR 29 13 11 24 0.828
2007-08 St. Scholastica D3 — SO 28 11 10 21 0.750
2006-07 St. Scholastica D3 — FR 24 5 3 8 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2006-07 · St. Scholastica
+375.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#43117
Forward overall
#1329
Forward born in 1985

D1 Comparables

Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Patrick Choi
Connecticut College · 2017-18
0.235 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Spencer Quinn
Fredonia · 2021-22
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Godfrey
Wilkes · 2017-18
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.