IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jeff Fedyk Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1986-02-11 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Canmore Eagles AJHL 48 0 3 3 0.062 0.0210 0.0222 0.0578 0.0610
2004-05 — BCHL 45 5 7 12 0.267 0.1028 0.1042 0.3881 0.3935
2005-06 — BCHL 52 1 5 6 0.115 0.0445 0.0429 0.1679 0.1618
2006-07 Powell River Kings BCHL 60 5 9 14 0.233 0.0899 0.0818 0.3395 0.3090
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Wentworth D3 CNE SO 9 3 2 5 0.556
2007-08 Wentworth D3 CNE FR 26 5 12 17 0.654
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.65
2007-08 · Wentworth
+946.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#21208
Defenseman overall
#1693
Defenseman born in 1986

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Eric Bertelsen
Elmira · 2023-24
0.304 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Luke Richards
Stonehill · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jared Domin
Adrian · 2017-18
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.