IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jeff Fedyk Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1986-02-11 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Canmore Eagles AJHL 48 0 3 3 0.062 0.0209 0.0220 0.0580 0.0612
2004-05 — BCHL 45 5 7 12 0.267 0.1038 0.1052 0.3889 0.3943
2005-06 — BCHL 52 1 5 6 0.115 0.0449 0.0433 0.1683 0.1622
2006-07 Powell River Kings BCHL 60 5 9 14 0.233 0.0908 0.0826 0.3402 0.3096
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Wentworth D3 — SO 9 3 2 5 0.556
2007-08 Wentworth D3 — FR 26 5 12 17 0.654
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.65
2007-08 · Wentworth
+936.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15513
Defenseman overall
#1512
Defenseman born in 1986

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Drew Brevig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Minerva
Aurora · 2016-17
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jared Williams
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2009-10
0.455 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Besner
Bryn Athyn · 2016-17
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.