IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Justin Krueger Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1986-10-06 Country: Germany
2006 · Round 7, Pick #213  ·  Carolina Hurricanes Carolina Hurricanes
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Penticton Vees BCHL 55 7 15 22 0.400 0.1541 0.1535 0.5821 0.5799
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 Cornell D1 ECAC SR 34 1 11 12 0.353
2008-09 Cornell D1 ECAC JR 35 1 4 5 0.143
2007-08 Cornell D1 ECAC SO 35 4 5 9 0.257
2006-07 Cornell D1 ECAC FR 31 1 5 6 0.194
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.19
2006-07 · Cornell
+33.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10913
Defenseman overall
#1197
Defenseman born in 1986
#2082
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Davis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Joe Schuldt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Michigan Tech
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
Mike Preston
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Army (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Bossert
Concordia · 2015-16
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ethan Byrne
St. Norbert · 2022-23
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brycon Johnson
Bryn Athyn · 2015-16
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.