IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Davis Pennington Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-05-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Wilkes-Barre/Scranton Knights NAHL 52 9 11 20 0.385 0.1413 0.1546 0.4059 0.4441
2019-20 Powell River Kings BCHL 57 2 30 32 0.561 0.2163 0.2163 0.8170 0.8170
2020-21 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 53 4 26 30 0.566 0.3339 0.3339 1.6999 1.6999
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC — 38 1 16 17 0.447
2023-24 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC — 39 3 21 24 0.615
2022-23 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC — 36 1 15 16 0.444
2021-22 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC — 30 2 5 7 0.233
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.23
2021-22 · Nebraska Omaha
+59.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
65%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4242
Defenseman overall
#974
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Luke Shiplo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Teemu Kivihalme
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Jimmy Schuldt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.63 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Gage Ausmus
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Connor Clifton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jordan Watts
Adrian · 2006-07
0.852 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Luc Malkhassian
Middlebury · 2022-23
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Emmond Bell
Norwich · 2004-05
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.