IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Austin Wong Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-08-26 Country: Canada
2018 · Round 7, Pick #215  ·  Winnipeg Jets Winnipeg Jets
Signed Professionally
Shanghai Dragons · KHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 53 10 10 20 0.377 0.1266 0.1440 0.3492 0.3973
2017-18 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 55 25 29 54 0.982 0.3293 0.3561 0.9086 0.9826
2018-19 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 47 29 33 62 1.319 0.4424 0.4570 1.2207 1.2610
2020-21 Fargo Force USHL 49 15 9 24 0.490 0.2889 0.2889 1.4711 1.4711
2023-24 Shanghai Dragons KHL 18 3 0 3 0.167 0.4167 0.4828 2.2969 2.6610
2024-25 Shanghai Dragons KHL 40 1 1 2 0.050 0.1250 0.1411 0.6889 0.7777
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Harvard D1 ECAC — 30 1 0 1 0.033
2021-22 Harvard D1 ECAC — 32 2 6 8 0.250
2019-20 Harvard D1 ECAC FR 21 4 2 6 0.286
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.36
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2019-20 · Harvard
-19.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
90%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20540
Forward overall
#941
Forward born in 2000

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan McDonald
Framingham State · 2011-12
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Luke Simpson
St. Scholastica · 2017-18
0.929 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ben Blasko
Nazareth · 2015-16
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.