IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brad Hunt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1988-08-24 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Coquitlam Express BCHL 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2006-07 Coquitlam Express BCHL 60 4 34 38 0.633 0.2440 0.2530 0.9216 0.9555
2007-08 Coquitlam Express BCHL 59 16 35 51 0.864 0.3331 0.3274 1.2580 1.2364
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Bemidji State D1 CCHA SR 38 5 21 26 0.684
2010-11 Bemidji State D1 CCHA JR 38 3 18 21 0.553
2009-10 Bemidji State D1 CCHA SO 37 7 26 33 0.892
2008-09 Bemidji State D1 CCHA FR 37 9 23 32 0.865
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.86
2008-09 · Bemidji State
+207.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#3535
Defenseman overall
#646
Defenseman born in 1988
#741
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Mike McKee
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Murray
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.74 PPG
→ Hamline (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Niklas Nevalainen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Davis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Tucker Poolman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nicolas Pigeon
Wisconsin-Stout · 2021-22
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Chandler Madry
Augsburg · 2014-15
0.966 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Dom Murphy
University of New England · 2022-23
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.