| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006-07 | Salmon Arm Silverbacks | BCHL | 59 | 11 | 20 | 31 | 0.525 | 0.1957 | 0.2008 | 0.7656 | 0.7855 |
| 2007-08 | Salmon Arm Silverbacks | BCHL | 60 | 21 | 41 | 62 | 1.033 | 0.3849 | 0.3741 | 1.5056 | 1.4635 |
| 2015-16 | Lukko | Liiga | 11 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0.364 | 0.9090 | 0.8633 | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-12 | Union | D1 | ECAC | SR | 41 | 8 | 34 | 42 | 1.024 |
| 2010-11 | Union | D1 | ECAC | JR | 40 | 13 | 29 | 42 | 1.050 |
| 2009-10 | Union | D1 | ECAC | SO | 39 | 10 | 14 | 24 | 0.615 |
| 2008-09 | Union | D1 | ECAC | FR | 39 | 6 | 14 | 20 | 0.513 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.