← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor Jones Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-08-16 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Vernon Vipers BCHL 2 1 2 3 1.500 0.5838 0.6630 2.1875 2.4841
2007-08 Vernon Vipers BCHL 50 24 30 54 1.080 0.4203 0.4546 1.5750 1.7037
2008-09 Vernon Vipers BCHL 60 19 41 60 1.000 0.3892 0.4047 1.4583 1.5162
2009-10 Vernon Vipers BCHL 51 36 45 81 1.588 0.6181 0.6089 2.3161 2.2816
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Becker D3 JR 9 0 1 1 0.111
2016-17 Becker D3 SO 18 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 Becker D3 FR 2 0 0 0 0.000
2013-14 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC SR 40 15 23 38 0.950
2012-13 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC JR 37 12 14 26 0.703
2011-12 Quinnipiac D1 SO 37 13 28 41 1.108
2010-11 Quinnipiac D1 FR 39 9 15 24 0.615
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.49
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.62
2010-11 · Quinnipiac
+25.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#2734
Forward overall
#116
Forward born in 1990
#71
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ RPI (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.98 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (1.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.60 Elite
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.43 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Developing
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Miami (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wilkes · 2016-17
1.385 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wilkes · 2016-17
1.423 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2017-18
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.