| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006-07 | Vernon Vipers | BCHL | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1.500 | 0.5838 | 0.6630 | 2.1875 | 2.4841 |
| 2007-08 | Vernon Vipers | BCHL | 50 | 24 | 30 | 54 | 1.080 | 0.4203 | 0.4546 | 1.5750 | 1.7037 |
| 2008-09 | Vernon Vipers | BCHL | 60 | 19 | 41 | 60 | 1.000 | 0.3892 | 0.4047 | 1.4583 | 1.5162 |
| 2009-10 | Vernon Vipers | BCHL | 51 | 36 | 45 | 81 | 1.588 | 0.6181 | 0.6089 | 2.3161 | 2.2816 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-18 | Becker | D3 | — | JR | 9 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.111 |
| 2016-17 | Becker | D3 | — | SO | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2015-16 | Becker | D3 | — | FR | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2013-14 | Quinnipiac | D1 | ECAC | SR | 40 | 15 | 23 | 38 | 0.950 |
| 2012-13 | Quinnipiac | D1 | ECAC | JR | 37 | 12 | 14 | 26 | 0.703 |
| 2011-12 | Quinnipiac | D1 | — | SO | 37 | 13 | 28 | 41 | 1.108 |
| 2010-11 | Quinnipiac | D1 | — | FR | 39 | 9 | 15 | 24 | 0.615 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.