IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mathew Bodie Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1990-03-07 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
ERC Ingolstadt · DEL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Selkirk Steelers MJHL 3 0 1 1 0.333 0.0642 0.0720 0.2102 0.2357
2008-09 Powell River Kings BCHL 53 1 41 42 0.792 0.3054 0.3108 1.1533 1.1735
2009-10 Powell River Kings BCHL 51 8 34 42 0.824 0.3173 0.3055 1.1984 1.1540
2018-19 Torpedo Nizhny Novgorod KHL 39 3 13 16 0.410 1.0257 0.9594 5.6534 5.2879
2019-20 — SHL 44 2 11 13 0.295 0.7388 0.7388 3.8559 3.8559
2020-21 ERC Ingolstadt DEL 30 3 19 22 0.733 1.8332 1.8332 6.2171 6.2171
2021-22 ERC Ingolstadt DEL 39 3 16 19 0.487 1.2180 1.0047 4.1306 3.4072
2022-23 ERC Ingolstadt DEL 49 4 21 25 0.510 1.2755 1.0146 4.3256 3.4410
2023-24 ERC Ingolstadt DEL 50 4 26 30 0.600 1.5000 1.1162 5.0869 3.7854
2024-25 ERC Ingolstadt DEL 40 2 18 20 0.500 1.2500 0.8728 4.2391 2.9598
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Union D1 ECAC — 40 8 31 39 0.975
2012-13 Union D1 ECAC — 35 6 18 24 0.686
2011-12 Union D1 ECAC — 39 8 21 29 0.744
2010-11 Union D1 ECAC — 40 6 26 32 0.800
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.80
2010-11 · Union
+175.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

⭐ Elite profile — high probability of D1 placement; comparable to top-end prospects
18%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
82%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#880
Defenseman overall
#198
Defenseman born in 1990

D2/3 Comparables

Gus Katsuras
Hamilton · 2001-02
1.400 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Ellis
SUNY Oswego · 2004-05
1.704 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Conor Landrigan
Utica · 2016-17
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.