IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alex Grieve Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-05-18 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Canmore Eagles AJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2008-09 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 49 12 12 24 0.490 0.1825 0.1875 0.7137 0.7332
2009-10 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 60 26 24 50 0.833 0.3104 0.3020 1.2142 1.1812
2010-11 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 60 31 47 78 1.300 0.4843 0.4484 1.8942 1.7540
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Bentley D1 AHA SR 28 5 11 16 0.571
2013-14 Bentley D1 AHA JR 37 25 22 47 1.270
2012-13 Bentley D1 AHA SO 35 10 21 31 0.886
2011-12 Bentley D1 — FR 39 15 19 34 0.872
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.33
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.87
2011-12 · Bentley
+161.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10992
Forward overall
#445
Forward born in 1990

D1 Comparables

Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Eric Scheid
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Average
NCAAe PPG
Shane Sooth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Average
NCAAe PPG
Michael Huntebrinker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.51 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Wahlin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mark Loza
Suffolk · 2001-02
1.308 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Quinn Waller
Adrian · 2006-07
1.586 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Skylur Jameson
Wentworth · 2007-08
1.778 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.