IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dennis Robertson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1991-05-24 Country: Canada
2011 · Round 6, Pick #173  ·  Toronto Maple Leafs Toronto Maple Leafs
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Langley Rivermen BCHL 55 1 11 12 0.218 0.0841 0.0907 0.3175 0.3423
2009-10 Langley Rivermen BCHL 53 9 25 34 0.641 0.2472 0.2530 0.9336 0.9556
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Brown D1 ECAC SR 30 6 11 17 0.567
2012-13 Brown D1 ECAC JR 36 3 17 20 0.556
2011-12 Brown D1 ECAC SO 32 2 14 16 0.500
2010-11 Brown D1 ECAC FR 30 6 11 17 0.567
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.57
2010-11 · Brown
+219.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8661
Defenseman overall
#1125
Defenseman born in 1991
#1828
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Matt Benning
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Renouf
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ Maine (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Ian Brady
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.64 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Chris Leibinger
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Gavin Bayreuther
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.95 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dan Woods
Salem State · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jackson Leef
Westfield State · 2010-11
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Marinac
SUNY Brockport · 2010-11
0.905 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.