IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Aiden Dubinsky Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-04-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Omaha Lancers USHL 49 1 11 12 0.245 0.1445 0.1445 0.7355 0.7355
2021-22 Tri-City Storm USHL 59 3 12 15 0.254 0.1500 0.1578 0.7635 0.8030
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin D1 BigTen SR 39 2 4 6 0.154
2024-25 Minnesota Duluth D1 NCHC — 36 4 10 14 0.389
2023-24 Minnesota Duluth D1 NCHC — 37 3 12 15 0.405
2022-23 Minnesota Duluth D1 NCHC — 29 0 5 5 0.172
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2022-23 · Minnesota Duluth
+15.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

62%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
20%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10414
Defenseman overall
#2234
Defenseman born in 2004
#3262
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Gage Ausmus
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Scott Savage
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Boston College (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Jimmy Schuldt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.63 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Dorantes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Connor Clifton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matthew Grannan
Bethel · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Wyatt Hinkson
Castleton · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Pier-Olivier Cotnoir
Norwich · 2006-07
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.