IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joey LaLeggia Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1992-06-24 Country: Canada
2012 · Round 4, Pick #123  ·  Edmonton Oilers Edmonton Oilers
Signed Professionally
Djurgårdens IF · SHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Penticton Vees BCHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2009-10 Penticton Vees BCHL 54 13 52 65 1.204 0.4638 0.5000 1.7517 1.8883
2010-11 Penticton Vees BCHL 58 20 62 82 1.414 0.5447 0.5616 2.0575 2.1214
2020-21 Rögle BK SHL 12 2 3 5 0.417 1.0417 1.0417 5.4374 5.4374
2021-22 Timrå IK SHL 52 9 29 38 0.731 1.8270 1.5712 9.5359 8.2009
2022-23 — SHL 49 18 20 38 0.775 1.9387 1.6215 10.1192 8.4634
2024-25 HV71 SHL 33 3 23 26 0.788 1.9698 1.4051 10.2810 7.3334
2025-26 Djurgårdens IF SHL 50 13 27 40 0.800 2.0000 2.0000 10.4389 10.4389
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Denver D1 NCHC SR 37 15 25 40 1.081
2013-14 Denver D1 NCHC JR 37 12 12 24 0.649
2012-13 Denver D1 WCHA-orig SO 39 11 18 29 0.744
2011-12 Denver D1 WCHA-orig FR 43 11 27 38 0.884
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.55
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.88
2011-12 · Denver
+60.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 34 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#8
Defenseman overall
#10
Defenseman born in 1992

D2/3 Comparables

Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Filimon Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.