IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ben Sexton Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-06-06 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Nepean Raiders CCHL 48 15 15 30 0.625 0.1996 0.2233 0.4838 0.5413
2008-09 Nepean Raiders CCHL 38 14 21 35 0.921 0.2941 0.3118 0.7130 0.7559
2009-10 Penticton Vees BCHL 50 13 29 42 0.840 0.3129 0.3208 1.2240 1.2550
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Clarkson D1 ECAC SR 35 6 22 28 0.800
2012-13 Clarkson D1 ECAC JR 28 5 15 20 0.714
2011-12 Clarkson D1 ECAC SO 27 8 21 29 1.074
2010-11 Clarkson D1 ECAC FR 12 5 3 8 0.667
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.67
2010-11 · Clarkson
+145.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#17538
Forward overall
#646
Forward born in 1991

D1 Comparables

Dylan Steman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.49 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jake Montgomery
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha
0.35 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jarrid Privitera
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Vermont (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Christian Lampasso
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Average
NCAAe PPG
Max Shuart
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Michigan
0.26 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nicholas Stevens
Wisconsin-Stout · 2019-20
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Galati
SUNY Oswego · 2010-11
1.241 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Carter Krenke
Saint John's · 2022-23
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.