IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Josh Manson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1991-10-07 Country: Canada
2011 · Round 5, Pick #160  ·  Anaheim Ducks Anaheim Ducks
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 — SJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2009-10 — BCHL 54 10 14 24 0.444 0.1712 0.1784 0.6467 0.6740
2010-11 — BCHL 57 12 35 47 0.825 0.3177 0.3162 1.2000 1.1944
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast JR 33 3 7 10 0.303
2012-13 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast SO 33 3 4 7 0.212
2011-12 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast FR 33 0 4 4 0.121
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2011-12 · Northeastern
-50.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#4602
Defenseman overall
#782
Defenseman born in 1991

D1 Comparables

Ryan Murray
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.74 PPG
→ Hamline (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Mike McKee
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Nelson Armstrong
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Davis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Lowney
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sean Matthews
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Roman Ammirato
Utica · 2011-12
1.296 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Dustin Fulton
Hamline · 2004-05
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.