IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bayard Hall Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-08-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Salisbury School NE-Prep 29 3 14 17 0.586 0.1654 0.1654 0.2682 0.2682
2019-20 Salisbury School NE-Prep 28 1 8 9 0.321 0.0907 0.0907 0.1471 0.1471
2020-21 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 44 1 5 6 0.136 0.0838 0.0838 0.4019 0.4019
2021-22 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 57 3 15 18 0.316 0.1941 0.1876 0.9304 0.8994
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Yale D1 ECAC SR 22 0 1 1 0.045
2024-25 Yale D1 ECAC JR 27 0 4 4 0.148
2023-24 Yale D1 ECAC SO 30 1 5 6 0.200
2022-23 Yale D1 ECAC FR 23 2 4 6 0.261
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.26
2022-23 · Yale
+85.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

60%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12257
Defenseman overall
#2455
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Davis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Mike McKee
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Albano
UMass Boston · 2015-16
1.296 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Rob Sgarbossa
SUNY Morrisville · 2005-06
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lee Swallow
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2003-04
1.214 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.