IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jakob Reichert Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-09-30 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Merritt Centennials BCHL 33 7 11 18 0.545 0.2102 0.2301 0.7939 0.8689
2011-12 Merritt Centennials BCHL 58 14 12 26 0.448 0.1727 0.1795 0.6524 0.6782
2012-13 Langley Rivermen BCHL 51 9 19 28 0.549 0.2115 0.2099 0.7990 0.7928
2013-14 Langley Rivermen BCHL 57 20 24 44 0.772 0.2974 0.2814 1.1233 1.0627
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Bowling Green D1 WCHA SR 7 0 1 1 0.143
2016-17 Bowling Green D1 WCHA JR 12 0 1 1 0.083
2015-16 Bowling Green D1 WCHA SO 18 3 1 4 0.222
2014-15 Bowling Green D1 WCHA FR 30 2 3 5 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2014-15 · Bowling Green
-23.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#23526
Forward overall
#820
Forward born in 1993
#1215
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joe Lewis
Finlandia · 2003-04
1.478 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Russell Anderson
Utica · 2007-08
1.059 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Kris Heeres
SUNY Geneseo · 2001-02
1.042 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.