IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Reece Willcox Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-03-20 Country: Canada
2012 · Round 5, Pick #141  ·  Philadelphia Flyers Philadelphia Flyers
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Merritt Centennials BCHL 53 5 9 14 0.264 0.1018 0.1138 0.3845 0.4298
2011-12 Merritt Centennials BCHL 52 5 18 23 0.442 0.1704 0.1811 0.6437 0.6842
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Cornell D1 ECAC SR 33 2 11 13 0.394
2014-15 Cornell D1 ECAC JR 21 1 3 4 0.191
2013-14 Cornell D1 ECAC SO 32 2 5 7 0.219
2012-13 Cornell D1 ECAC FR 34 0 5 5 0.147
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.15
2012-13 · Cornell
1.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12157
Defenseman overall
#1570
Defenseman born in 1994
#2226
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Steven Santini
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Boston College (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Roy
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Josh Couturier
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Boston College (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Trevor Hamilton
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Miami (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Mark Auk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Marinac
SUNY Brockport · 2009-10
0.905 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Skylur Jameson
Wentworth · 2004-05
1.778 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Galati
SUNY Oswego · 2009-10
1.241 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.