IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mike Reilly Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1993-07-13 Country: USA
2011 · Round 4, Pick #98  ·  Columbus Blue Jackets Columbus Blue Jackets
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 — BCHL 51 24 59 83 1.627 0.6271 0.6451 2.3685 2.4364
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Minnesota D1 BigTen JR 39 6 36 42 1.077
2013-14 Minnesota D1 BigTen SO 41 9 24 33 0.805
2012-13 Minnesota D1 WCHA-orig FR 37 3 11 14 0.378
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.66
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2012-13 · Minnesota
-42.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#806
Defenseman overall
#198
Defenseman born in 1993
#17
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Ian McCoshen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.83 PPG
→ Boston College (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Ford
Elmira · 2014-15
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Joseph Fiorino
Southern New Hampshire · 2016-17
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jason Kalinowski
Endicott · 2015-16
1.310 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.