IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brady Shaw Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-10-02 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 — BCHL 59 33 36 69 1.169 0.4506 0.4460 1.7020 1.6847
2012-13 — BCHL 54 38 32 70 1.296 0.4995 0.4708 1.8865 1.7781
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Vermont D1 HockeyEast SR 34 8 11 19 0.559
2015-16 Vermont D1 HockeyEast JR 36 4 12 16 0.444
2014-15 Vermont D1 HockeyEast SO 38 19 12 31 0.816
2013-14 Vermont D1 HockeyEast FR 34 6 5 11 0.324
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.39
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2013-14 · Vermont
-18.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6811
Forward overall
#322
Forward born in 1992
#92
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tim Bonner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.48 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Luke Moodie
SUNY Oswego · 2008-09
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
T.J. Sneath
Lebanon Valley · 2014-15
0.773 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Arvega Hovsepyan
Salve Regina · 2023-24
1.385 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.