← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mike Moran Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-09-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 BCHL 39 18 28 46 1.179 0.4545 0.4255 1.7165 1.6071
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Worcester State D1 MASCAC SR 17 12 13 25 1.471
2018-19 Worcester State D3 MASCAC SR 17 12 13 25 1.471
2017-18 Worcester State D3 MASCAC JR 26 16 16 32 1.231
2016-17 Worcester State D3 MASCAC SO 17 6 7 13 0.765
2015-16 Boston University D1 HockeyEast 39 5 5 10 0.256
2015-16 Worcester State D3 MASCAC FR 23 4 3 7 0.304
2014-15 Boston University D1 HockeyEast 38 4 1 5 0.132
2013-14 Boston University D1 HockeyEast 31 5 3 8 0.258
2012-13 Boston University D1 HockeyEast 33 1 1 2 0.061
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.36
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.06
2012-13 · Boston University
-83.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7663
Forward overall
#327
Forward born in 1991
#126
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.48 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Geneseo · 2014-15
1.161 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2022-23
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2005-06
1.391 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.