IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Demico Hannoun Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-10-04 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Surrey Eagles BCHL 49 12 14 26 0.531 0.2044 0.2330 0.7722 0.8803
2012-13 Surrey Eagles BCHL 42 14 19 33 0.786 0.3027 0.3308 1.1434 1.2494
2013-14 Vernon Vipers BCHL 47 15 29 44 0.936 0.3607 0.3775 1.3625 1.4259
2014-15 Penticton Vees BCHL 52 23 18 41 0.788 0.3038 0.3038 1.1475 1.1474
2015-16 Penticton Vees BCHL 38 14 19 33 0.868 0.3346 0.3166 1.2638 1.1960
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA SO 29 2 4 6 0.207
2016-17 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA FR 15 1 4 5 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2016-17 · Northern Michigan
+25.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#14388
Forward overall
#564
Forward born in 1995
#537
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Michel Bond
SUNY Geneseo · 2001-02
1.083 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Harrison Follett
Misericordia · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Quinn Tavares
Salve Regina · 2023-24
0.962 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.