← New Search ↗ Social Card

Craig Martin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-03-15 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 9 5 2 7 0.778 0.2997 0.3333 1.1319 1.2589
2012-13 Vernon Vipers BCHL 37 7 9 16 0.432 0.1666 0.1774 0.6293 0.6701
2013-14 BCHL 50 13 16 29 0.580 0.2235 0.2277 0.8441 0.8599
2014-15 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 41 19 27 46 1.122 0.4323 0.4203 1.6328 1.5873
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC SR 38 11 19 30 0.789
2017-18 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC JR 38 4 10 14 0.368
2016-17 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC SO 40 11 16 27 0.675
2015-16 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC FR 18 1 3 4 0.222
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2015-16 · Quinnipiac
-24.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16550
Forward overall
#626
Forward born in 1995
#678
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.72 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Princeton (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Superior · 2000-01
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2007-08
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Salve Regina · 2018-19
1.409 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.