IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Seamus Powell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-04-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 45 2 7 9 0.200 0.1551 0.1551 0.7444 0.7444
2021-22 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 58 1 13 14 0.241 0.1872 0.1829 0.8985 0.8781
2023-24 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 61 4 28 32 0.525 0.3225 0.3063 1.5456 1.4679
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast JR 39 3 15 18 0.462
2024-25 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast — 35 5 16 21 0.600
2022-23 Boston College D1 HockeyEast — 21 1 0 1 0.048
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.05
2022-23 · Boston College
-72.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

80%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4067
Defenseman overall
#1066
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Jared Kolquist
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Christopher Dienes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Connor Murphy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Cornell (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Tucker Poolman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Victor Björkung
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jason Cassells
Elmira · 2000-01
0.955 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lucas Michaud
Trinity · 2016-17
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Johnny Panvica
St. Thomas · 2014-15
0.955 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.