← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Roberts Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-01-06 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Vernon Vipers BCHL 10 0 1 1 0.100 0.0372 0.0410 0.1457 0.1607
2012-13 Vernon Vipers BCHL 53 4 6 10 0.189 0.0703 0.0742 0.2750 0.2903
2013-14 BCHL 54 8 14 22 0.407 0.1518 0.1532 0.5936 0.5992
2014-15 BCHL 10 2 1 3 0.300 0.1118 0.1076 0.4371 0.4209
2015-16 Vernon Vipers BCHL 21 1 2 3 0.143 0.0532 0.0484 0.2082 0.1893
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

NCAAe Rankings

#47878
Forward overall
#2080
Forward born in 1995
#3063
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Dartmouth · 2023-24
0.312 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Nazareth · 2024-25
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2015-16
0.235 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.