IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bradley Parker Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-04-08 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2012-13 Powell River Kings BCHL 33 3 6 9 0.273 0.1051 0.1018 0.3963 0.3837
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Syracuse ACHA_D1 — — 15 2 2 4 0.267
2024-25 Syracuse ACHA_D1 — — 15 2 2 4 0.267
2023-24 Syracuse ACHA_D1 — — 15 2 2 4 0.267
2022-23 Syracuse ACHA_D1 — — 15 2 2 4 0.267
2021-22 Syracuse ACHA_D1 — — 15 2 2 4 0.267
2020-21 Syracuse ACHA_D1 — — 15 2 2 4 0.267
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2020-21 · Syracuse
+206.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#46502
Forward overall
#1723
Forward born in 1993
#2629
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Zach Zech
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2015-16
0.586 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tobias Gabrielsen
St. Olaf · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Blake Rielly
SUNY Brockport · 2003-04
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.