← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cal Thomas Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-05-08 Country: USA
2021 · Round 6, Pick #171  ·  Utah Mammoth Utah Mammoth (via ARI)
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Maple Grove USHS-MN 31 7 20 27 0.871 0.1103 0.1103 0.2116 0.2116
2020-21 USHL 9 1 1 2 0.222 0.1311 0.1311 0.6674 0.6674
2021-22 USHL 61 4 21 25 0.410 0.2417 0.2424 1.2308 1.2344
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Minnesota D1 BigTen SR 31 1 4 5 0.161
2024-25 Minnesota D1 BigTen JR 27 1 8 9 0.333
2023-24 Minnesota D1 BigTen SO 38 1 9 10 0.263
2022-23 Minnesota D1 BigTen FR 40 0 6 6 0.150
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.15
2022-23 · Minnesota
-16.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

78%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4085
Defenseman overall
#1018
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Union (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ Maine (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.78 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.64 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Buffalo State · 2018-19
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Anselm · 2015-16
0.655 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Aurora · 2015-16
0.308 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.