IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Viktor Dombrovskiy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-04-27 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Langley Rivermen BCHL 45 3 10 13 0.289 0.1113 0.1248 0.4202 0.4710
2013-14 Langley Rivermen BCHL 45 1 14 15 0.333 0.1284 0.1380 0.4848 0.5210
2014-15 — BCHL 38 4 26 30 0.789 0.3042 0.3128 1.1482 1.1805
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Harvard D1 ECAC SR 5 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Harvard D1 ECAC JR 10 0 1 1 0.100
2016-17 Harvard D1 ECAC SO 31 4 6 10 0.323
2015-16 Harvard D1 ECAC FR 10 1 0 1 0.100
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.10
2015-16 · Harvard
-56.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7122
Defenseman overall
#1212
Defenseman born in 1996
#1618
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Jaccob Slavin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.78 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Gavin Bayreuther
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.95 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Jeff Taylor
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Union (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Ian Brady
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.64 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Benning
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Craig Levey
Hobart · 2000-01
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brent Wold
Utica · 2011-12
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Kangas
St. Thomas · 2016-17
0.474 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.