IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Craig Levey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1982-05-28 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Mississauga Chargers OJHL 46 30 22 52 1.130 0.2771 0.2721 0.7783 0.7642
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2004-05 Hobart D3 SUNYAC SR 24 9 9 18 0.750
2003-04 Hobart D3 SUNYAC JR 25 17 17 34 1.360
2002-03 Hobart D3 SUNYAC SO 26 18 14 32 1.231
2001-02 Hobart D3 SUNYAC FR 26 13 14 27 1.038
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.04
2001-02 · Hobart
+345.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12902
Forward overall
#427
Forward born in 1982
#326
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Christian Lampasso
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alex Rauter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Cornell (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Pham
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Army (0.91 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Nikolas Olsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Boston University (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Steman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.49 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ronny Paragallo
Assumption · 2020-21
0.552 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wyatt Wurst
St. Scholastica · 2021-22
1.042 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Aaron Swanson
St. Thomas · 2017-18
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.