IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Craig Levey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1982-05-28 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Mississauga Chargers OJHL 46 30 22 52 1.130 0.3158 0.3101 0.7801 0.7659
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2004-05 Hobart D3 — SR 24 9 9 18 0.750
2003-04 Hobart D3 — JR 25 17 17 34 1.360
2002-03 Hobart D3 — SO 26 18 14 32 1.231
2001-02 Hobart D3 — FR 26 13 14 27 1.038
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.04
2001-02 · Hobart
+291.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9413
Forward overall
#357
Forward born in 1982
#379
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Jason Ford
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Conor O'Neil
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Vermont (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Christian Lampasso
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG
Cody Gylling
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Arizona State (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Steman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.49 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Aaron Swanson
St. Thomas · 2017-18
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ronny Paragallo
Assumption · 2020-21
0.552 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wyatt Wurst
St. Scholastica · 2021-22
1.042 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.