IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Wyatt Wurst Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-12-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Edina USHS-MN 27 3 3 6 0.222 0.0598 0.0598 0.0540 0.0540
2020-21 Edina USHS-MN 20 0 5 5 0.250 0.0673 0.0673 0.0607 0.0607
2021-22 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 10 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2022-23 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 46 1 6 7 0.152 0.0565 0.0579 0.1611 0.1651
2023-24 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 54 1 15 16 0.296 0.1100 0.1075 0.3137 0.3065
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC SO 25 3 4 7 0.280
2024-25 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC FR 24 5 20 25 1.042
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.04
2024-25 · St. Scholastica
+1158.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
38%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17554
Defenseman overall
#2514
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Garret Peterson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ Army (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.16 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Patrick Gazich
Gustavus Adolphus · 2016-17
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Raymond Fleming
St. Olaf · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jim Pollock
Bryn Athyn · 2016-17
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.