← New Search ↗ Social Card

Steve Hladin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-12-27 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Georgetown Raiders OJHL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.0601 0.0685 0.1369 0.1561
2011-12 Vaughan Vipers OJHL 42 14 25 39 0.929 0.2790 0.3057 0.6356 0.6965
2012-13 Georgetown Raiders OJHL 38 22 20 42 1.105 0.3320 0.3473 0.7566 0.7914
2013-14 Georgetown Raiders OJHL 53 38 45 83 1.566 0.4704 0.4680 1.0719 1.0665
2014-15 Georgetown Raiders OJHL 52 41 63 104 2.000 0.6008 0.5667 1.3690 1.2912
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Sacred Heart D1 AHA SR 33 2 4 6 0.182
2017-18 Sacred Heart D1 AHA JR 33 6 11 17 0.515
2016-17 Sacred Heart D1 AHA SO 31 9 6 15 0.484
2015-16 Sacred Heart D1 AHA 0 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#5522
Forward overall
#276
Forward born in 1994
#27
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Union (0.89 D1 FR PPG)
0.55 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.68 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Salve Regina · 2015-16
1.381 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2002-03
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Finlandia · 2018-19
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.