← New Search ↗ Social Card

Morgan Winters Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-12-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Tabor NE-Prep 27 13 23 36 1.333 0.2681 0.2681 0.6097 0.6097
2019-20 Tabor NE-Prep 24 8 20 28 1.167 0.2346 0.2346 0.5335 0.5335
2020-21 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 34 13 20 33 0.971 0.3566 0.3566 0.7502 0.7502
2021-22 — USHL 52 12 25 37 0.712 0.4197 0.3913 2.1350 1.9905
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast SR 33 11 11 22 0.667
2024-25 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast — 26 2 12 14 0.538
2023-24 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast — 33 10 12 22 0.667
2022-23 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast — 20 4 0 4 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2022-23 · New Hampshire
-28.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

85%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9480
Forward overall
#430
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2001-02
1.226 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Nichols · 2010-11
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2002-03
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.