IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jonah Renouf Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-03-11 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 King Rebellion OJHL 47 23 39 62 1.319 0.3233 0.3414 0.9082 0.9590
2012-13 Oakville Blades OJHL 53 29 65 94 1.774 0.4347 0.4374 1.2211 1.2286
2013-14 Surrey Eagles BCHL 52 20 41 61 1.173 0.4520 0.4376 1.7072 1.6530
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA JR 27 2 3 5 0.185
2017-18 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA JR 26 3 11 14 0.538
2016-17 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA SO 33 3 6 9 0.273
2014-15 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#6992
Forward overall
#333
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Chad McDonald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Average
NCAAe PPG
Phil Marinaccio
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jared Linnell
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.72 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Charlie O'Connor
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Michael Vecchione
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Union (0.89 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Rusty Masters
Elmira · 2005-06
0.962 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Reed
Curry · 2009-10
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Armour
Adrian · 2013-14
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.