| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-06 | Eispiraten Crimmitschau | DEL2 | 45 | 20 | 38 | 58 | 1.289 | 0.5560 | 0.5650 | — | — |
| 2006-07 | Eispiraten Crimmitschau | DEL2 | 45 | 20 | 38 | 58 | 1.289 | 0.5560 | 0.5650 | — | — |
| 2007-08 | Eispiraten Crimmitschau | DEL2 | 45 | 20 | 38 | 58 | 1.289 | 0.5560 | 0.5650 | — | — |
| 2008-09 | Eispiraten Crimmitschau | DEL2 | 45 | 20 | 38 | 58 | 1.289 | 0.5560 | 0.5650 | — | — |
| 2009-10 | Eispiraten Crimmitschau | DEL2 | 45 | 20 | 38 | 58 | 1.289 | 0.5560 | 0.5650 | — | — |
| 2010-11 | Eispiraten Crimmitschau | DEL2 | 45 | 20 | 38 | 58 | 1.289 | 0.5560 | 0.5650 | — | — |
| 2011-12 | Eispiraten Crimmitschau | DEL2 | 45 | 20 | 38 | 58 | 1.289 | 0.5560 | 0.5650 | — | — |
| 2012-13 | Eispiraten Crimmitschau | DEL2 | 45 | 20 | 38 | 58 | 1.289 | 0.5560 | 0.5650 | — | — |
| 2013-14 | Coquitlam Express | BCHL | 57 | 24 | 26 | 50 | 0.877 | 0.3268 | 0.3335 | 1.2782 | 1.3046 |
| 2014-15 | Coquitlam Express | BCHL | 58 | 50 | 54 | 104 | 1.793 | 0.6679 | 0.6506 | 2.6127 | 2.5448 |
| 2021-22 | HC Vita Hästen | Allsvenskan | 51 | 13 | 18 | 31 | 0.608 | 1.5195 | 1.4212 | — | — |
| 2024-25 | Eispiraten Crimmitschau | DEL2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 1.000 | 0.4314 | 0.3758 | — | — |
| 2025-26 | Eispiraten Crimmitschau | DEL2 | 45 | 20 | 38 | 58 | 1.289 | 0.5560 | 0.5650 | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-19 | Ferris State | D1 | WCHA | SR | 36 | 10 | 15 | 25 | 0.694 |
| 2017-18 | Ferris State | D1 | WCHA | JR | 36 | 10 | 15 | 25 | 0.694 |
| 2016-17 | Ferris State | D1 | WCHA | SO | 36 | 13 | 13 | 26 | 0.722 |
| 2015-16 | Ferris State | D1 | WCHA | FR | 41 | 10 | 15 | 25 | 0.610 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.