IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nathan Renouf Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-03-11 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 King Rebellion OJHL 47 12 40 52 1.106 0.2712 0.2864 0.7618 0.8044
2012-13 Oakville Blades OJHL 54 21 56 77 1.426 0.3495 0.3516 0.9817 0.9877
2013-14 Surrey Eagles BCHL 40 15 34 49 1.225 0.4720 0.4570 1.7827 1.7261
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA JR 10 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA JR 23 2 5 7 0.304
2016-17 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA SO 24 1 8 9 0.375
2014-15 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#8396
Forward overall
#385
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Chad McDonald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Average
NCAAe PPG
Phil Marinaccio
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Michael Vecchione
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Union (0.89 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Jared Linnell
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.72 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dominik Shine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.90 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Connor Powell
Elmira · 2015-16
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brian Berger
Marian · 2010-11
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Cole Hepler
Lebanon Valley · 2014-15
1.280 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.