IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Paul Stoykewych Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-03-09 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Winnipeg Blues MJHL 57 6 18 24 0.421 0.0811 0.0912 0.2655 0.2986
2012-13 Winnipeg Blues MJHL 52 4 24 28 0.538 0.1037 0.1115 0.3396 0.3651
2013-14 Penticton Vees BCHL 53 4 15 19 0.358 0.1381 0.1406 0.5217 0.5311
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Western Michigan D1 NCHC SR 27 5 8 13 0.481
2016-17 Western Michigan D1 NCHC JR 24 2 2 4 0.167
2015-16 Western Michigan D1 NCHC SO 21 1 5 6 0.286
2014-15 Western Michigan D1 NCHC FR 10 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#12629
Defenseman overall
#1676
Defenseman born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Tim Davison
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Garret Cockerill
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Zach Frye
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Justin Woods
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Wingels
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Miami
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Peter Unger
Keene State · 2022-23
0.957 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Owen Stadheim
Williams · 2020-21
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Owen Sweet
Wesleyan · 2020-21
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.