IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dante Fabbro Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-06-20 Country: Canada
2016 · Round 1, Pick #17  ·  Nashville Predators Nashville Predators
Signed Professionally

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 — BCHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2014-15 — BCHL 44 4 29 33 0.750 0.2890 0.3281 1.0915 1.2393
2015-16 — BCHL 45 14 53 67 1.489 0.5737 0.6207 2.1668 2.3442
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Boston University D1 HockeyEast — 38 7 26 33 0.868
2017-18 Boston University D1 HockeyEast — 38 9 20 29 0.763
2016-17 Boston University D1 HockeyEast — 36 6 12 18 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.52
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2016-17 · Boston University
-3.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Ian McCoshen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.83 PPG
→ Boston College (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joseph Fiorino
Southern New Hampshire · 2016-17
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Reifler
Elmira · 2016-17
1.067 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Ford
Elmira · 2014-15
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.