Gabe Bast Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-12-20 Country: Canada

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2013-14	Spruce Grove Saints	AJHL	3	1	0	1	0.333	0.1118	0.1232	0.3084	0.3399
2014-15	Penticton Vees	BCHL	49	9	31	40	0.816	0.3145	0.3335	1.1880	1.2599
2015-16	Penticton Vees	BCHL	8	1	5	6	0.750	0.2890	0.2910	1.0915	1.0991
2016-17	Penticton Vees	BCHL	14	2	6	8	0.571	0.2202	0.2105	0.8316	0.7949
2021-22	KalPa	Liiga	18	3	1	4	0.222	0.5555	0.5684	1.9101	1.9544

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2020-21	North Dakota	D1	NCHC	SR	21	1	3	4	0.191
2019-20	North Dakota	D1	NCHC	JR	22	2	3	5	0.227
2018-19	North Dakota	D1	NCHC	SO	36	5	7	12	0.333
2017-18	North Dakota	D1	NCHC	FR	27	1	10	11	0.407

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

0.23

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

0.41

2017-18 · North Dakota

+77.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

NCAA D1

NCAA D2/D3

98%

Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1927

Defenseman overall

#407

Defenseman born in 1996

D2/3 Comparables

Jake McAlpine

Wisconsin-Stout · 2022-23

0.542 Average

actual D2/3 PPG

Joseph Sposit

Nichols · 2010-11

0.778 Strong

actual D2/3 PPG

Dylan Clarke

SUNY Plattsburgh · 2006-07

1.267 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.