IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Anthony Rinaldi Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-08-17 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 53 22 16 38 0.717 0.2763 0.2745 1.0428 1.0358
2015-16 Collingwood Blues OJHL 52 38 35 73 1.404 0.3441 0.3165 0.9662 0.8888
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Union D1 ECAC SR 37 9 20 29 0.784
2018-19 Union D1 ECAC JR 37 11 12 23 0.622
2017-18 Union D1 ECAC SO 36 17 11 28 0.778
2016-17 Union D1 ECAC FR 30 3 1 4 0.133
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.13
2016-17 · Union
-48.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11847
Forward overall
#481
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joe Birmingham
Connecticut College · 2011-12
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Alexei Filimonov
Fitchburg State · 2024-25
1.560 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Grant Everett
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2007-08
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.