IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Rutigliano Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-04-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 57 1 10 11 0.193 0.0744 0.0763 0.2809 0.2879
2015-16 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 58 6 18 24 0.414 0.1594 0.1549 0.6022 0.5851
2016-17 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 45 3 14 17 0.378 0.1456 0.1340 0.5498 0.5060
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Hamilton D3 NESCAC SR 20 8 4 12 0.600
2020-21 Hamilton D3 NESCAC JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Hamilton D1 NESCAC SO 25 3 4 7 0.280
2019-20 Hamilton D3 NESCAC SO 25 3 4 7 0.280
2018-19 Hamilton D1 NESCAC FR 25 3 14 17 0.680
2018-19 Hamilton D3 NESCAC FR 25 3 14 17 0.680
2017-18 Bentley D1 AHA — 0 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#13054
Defenseman overall
#1796
Defenseman born in 1996
#2300
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Colton Brausen
Wisconsin-Stout · 2015-16
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Dain Sardelli
Concordia · 2021-22
0.421 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jake Fuss
University of New England · 2018-19
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.